Is Erbium Laser Better Than Microneedling? A Complete Comparison Guide
Is Erbium Laser Better Than Microneedling? A Complete Comparison Guide
Content of this Paper
↑
Erbium laser resurfacing and microneedling both rejuvenate the skin by boosting collagen, improving tone, and refining texture, but they work in very different ways.
The erbium laser uses light energy absorbed by the skin to remove damaged layers and resurface deeply, offering faster, more dramatic results for wrinkles and pigmentation.
Microneedling creates micro-injuries within the skin to trigger natural collagen repair. It’s gentler, non-ablative, and ideal for darker or sensitive skin with minimal downtime.
This guide compares microneedling vs erbium laser to help you choose the best option based on your skin goals, recovery time, and desired results.
%20(6).png)
Key Takeaways
- Erbium laser offers deeper, faster resurfacing for wrinkles and pigmentation.
- Microneedling is gentler and safe for sensitive or darker skin.
- Erbium laser provides dramatic results, while microneedling builds gradual improvement.
- Microneedling suits maintenance, and erbium laser suits full rejuvenation.
- Combining both treatments enhances collagen and long-term skin renewal.
Understanding the Difference Between Erbium Laser and Microneedling
While both treatments aim to refine skin tone and texture, they function very differently beneath the surface. Knowing the mechanism of each helps you choose the right option for your skin’s needs and recovery tolerance.
Erbium laser resurfacing, a precise form of laser treatment, uses controlled light energy to remove damaged skin cells and trigger deep collagen renewal, offering faster and more targeted rejuvenation.
Microneedling versus laser treatments comes down to how they create controlled skin injury: lasers use light energy, while microneedling uses fine mechanical punctures. Both initiate a similar wound-healing cascade, collagen and elastin synthesis, but with different levels of precision and depth.
How Erbium Laser Works for Skin Resurfacing
Erbium laser is a highly targeted laser treatment that uses precise light energy absorbed by water in the skin to vaporise damaged cells layer by layer. This ablative laser approach physically removes the outer layers while stimulating collagen regeneration deep in the dermis.
Depending on the goal, dermatologists may use a fractional laser (treating micro-columns of skin for faster recovery) or a fully ablative laser (treating the entire surface for dramatic renewal). The healing process typically lasts one to two weeks, as new skin forms and old tissue sheds.
Compared to the CO2 laser, erbium is gentler and causes less thermal injury, making it ideal for patients seeking noticeable resurfacing with a shorter downtime. The result: smoother, tighter, more even skin once the tissue regenerates.
How Microneedling Stimulates Natural Collagen Repair
Microneedling, also known as collagen-induction therapy, uses ultra-fine sterile needles to create micro-channels in the skin. These controlled punctures trigger the body’s natural healing response, stimulating fibroblasts to produce new collagen and elastin without removing surface layers.
Unlike ablative or fractional lasers, microneedling is a non-ablative approach, meaning the epidermis stays intact. This makes it safer for all skin tones, including darker or reactive types, and reduces the chance of pigmentation or extended downtime.
The healing process after microneedling is mild, typically 24–72 hours of redness or tightness, compared to a week or more for laser resurfacing treatments like erbium or CO2 laser.
The Science Behind Collagen Remodeling in Both Treatments
Both microneedling and laser therapies work by stimulating collagen, but the method and intensity differ:
- Erbium laser directly heats the dermis using concentrated light, causing collagen contraction and new synthesis for rapid tightening.
- Microneedling, by contrast, relies on micro-wound healing to gradually remodel tissue through repeated sessions.
In microneedling vs laser resurfacing, the laser induces a stronger, faster response due to controlled thermal energy, while microneedling achieves progressive improvement with little downtime.
Some clinics even combine them, performing microneedling and laser alternately, to balance short-term rejuvenation with long-term collagen strengthening. This hybrid approach blends the depth of fractional laser energy with the restorative benefits of mechanical collagen induction.
Comparing Ablative vs Non-Ablative Technologies
When deciding between microneedling vs erbium laser, understanding how ablative and non-ablative technologies differ is essential. Both methods target collagen regeneration but through distinct mechanisms, recovery times, and depths of treatment.
Ablative lasers, such as the erbium laser or CO2 laser, remove precise layers of damaged skin to resurface and renew from the inside out. They deliver more dramatic results in fewer sessions but require a longer healing process.
Non-ablative treatments like microneedling stimulate collagen production beneath the surface without removing the epidermis. The result is gradual rejuvenation, minimal downtime, and a safer option for a broader range of skin types.
To understand how these two treatments differ in intensity, results, and downtime, here’s a quick comparison between Erbium laser (ablative/fractional) and microneedling (non-ablative):
Erbium Laser (Ablative / Fractional Laser)
- Ablative laser removes outer skin layers for resurfacing.
- Uses light energy to vaporize damaged cells and stimulate collagen.
- Targets both epidermis and dermis for dramatic resurfacing.
- Healing takes 5–10 days with redness and peeling.
- Results are fast and visible after one session.
- Downtime is moderate to high.
- Best for wrinkles, pigmentation, scars, and uneven skin tone/texture.
- Summary: Provides dramatic resurfacing results.
Microneedling (Non-Ablative)
- Creates micro-injuries without removing skin (non-ablative).
- Uses fine needles to trigger natural collagen repair.
- Works within the dermis to rejuvenate skin from within.
- Healing involves mild redness and tightness for 1–3 days.
- Results build gradually over multiple sessions.
- Downtime is minimal; most resume normal activity within 24 hours.
- Best for mild scarring, enlarged pores, and early signs of aging.
- Summary: Rejuvenates naturally with less downtime.
Key Differences: Erbium Laser vs Microneedling
While both skin treatments enhance overall tone, texture, and collagen production, the strength, precision, and recovery experience between microneedling vs laser therapies differ significantly. Understanding these distinctions helps you choose the right approach for your individual goals, whether you want full resurfacing or subtle rejuvenation.
Depth of Treatment and Precision Control
The erbium laser is a highly advanced specific laser system that allows dermatologists to target controlled depths with sub-millimetre accuracy. As an ablative laser, it removes precise layers of damaged tissue, making it ideal for addressing fine lines, deeper wrinkles, and stubborn pigmentation. When used fractionally, it leaves surrounding skin intact for faster recovery while still delivering strong skin tightening effects.
In contrast, microneedling creates controlled mechanical punctures, typically 0.25–2.5 mm deep, to stimulate collagen and elastin production. It does not remove tissue, making it a nonablative and minimally invasive alternative suitable for all skin types, including skin of color.
However, it is less precise than fractional or CO2 laser resurfacing and achieves more gradual improvements through repeated sessions.
Skin Concerns Each Treatment Targets Best
Each method has unique advantages depending on the condition treated. The table below highlights which treatment options perform best for common concerns:
Erbium Laser
- Excellent for reducing fine lines, wrinkles, pigmentation, and uneven skin tone.
- Strong efficacy on acne scars, enlarged pores, and texture irregularities.
- Moderate improvement in stretch marks.
- Not suitable during active acne breakouts.
- Requires expert settings for skin of color or uses nonablative mode to avoid complications.
- Works by ablative resurfacing, removing damaged skin layers and stimulating collagen.
- Offers fast, visible results with moderate to high downtime.
- Personalized treatment options for various skin types and concerns.
- Short recovery period compared to other ablative lasers.
- Can be combined with other therapies for enhanced effects.
Microneedling
- Moderate improvement in fine lines, wrinkles, pigmentation, and uneven tone.
- Strong effectiveness on acne scars, enlarged pores, and overall skin texture.
- Excellent for stretch marks.
- Can be adapted safely for mild acne-prone skin and darker skin tones.
- Non-ablative with minimal downtime, triggering collagen through micro-injuries.
- Gradual results build over multiple sessions.
- Less invasive and suitable for patients seeking natural rejuvenation with shorter recovery.
Erbium and CO2 laser resurfacing options are particularly powerful for resurfacing texture irregularities, while microneedling is gentler and safer for those prone to hyperpigmentation or post-inflammatory reactions.
Downtime, Pain Level, and Recovery Experience
Recovery experiences between these laser therapies and mechanical treatments differ greatly. Erbium laser resurfacing typically requires 5–10 days of downtime, depending on the depth and whether it’s a fractional or full ablative procedure.
Redness, peeling, and warmth are expected as part of the healing process, and numbing cream or mild sedation is often used for comfort. Patients usually see dramatic renewal in skin tone and texture once healing completes.
By contrast, microneedling has a shorter recovery, usually 24–72 hours of mild redness and tightness. Only topical anaesthetic is needed, and most patients resume normal activities within a day. While microneedling vs laser downtime differs, both benefit from diligent post-procedure care and sun avoidance to protect new skin as collagen rebuilds.
Customization and Device Variations (Fractional, RF Microneedling, etc.)
Modern laser therapies and microneedling devices can be customised to match skin type and concern severity.
- Erbium laser: Available in multiple modes, including fractional erbium YAG for controlled ablation with shorter downtime and full ablative laser settings for intensive resurfacing. Some clinics also offer glass laser systems and CO2 laser resurfacing, which penetrate deeper for significant wrinkle and scar correction but require longer recovery.
- Microneedling: Variations such as radiofrequency (RF) microneedling combine mechanical stimulation with heat energy, promoting firmer, tighter skin and deeper collagen renewal. RF-assisted devices provide noticeable skin tightening and contouring benefits compared to standard microneedling.
Both microneedling and laser methods can be adjusted by depth, density, and energy to balance comfort, downtime, and result intensity.
Effectiveness: Which Delivers Better Results?
Both microneedling and erbium laser resurfacing are clinically proven skin treatments that improve skin tone and texture, boost collagen, and reduce visible signs of aging. However, their intensity, rate of improvement, and overall results differ significantly.
While laser therapies like erbium offer faster transformation through controlled ablation, microneedling provides gradual, buildable results with minimal risk and downtime.
Erbium Laser for Fine Lines, Wrinkles, and Pigmentation
Erbium laser resurfacing remains one of the most advanced laser treatment options for addressing fine lines, deep wrinkles, and severe sun damage. This ablative laser removes micro-thin layers of damaged skin, stimulating new cell turnover and collagen remodeling for dramatic rejuvenation.
The erbium laser treats concerns such as uneven skin tone, sun-induced pigmentation, and early age-related changes. Its precise technology allows controlled resurfacing with minimal thermal damage, making it an excellent option for patients seeking visible rejuvenation with shorter recovery time.
Within just one or two sessions, patients can see visible improvements in skin tone and texture, reduced pigmentation, and firmer, more even skin. Erbium also performs well on atrophic acne scars, restoring smoother contours and improved elasticity through deep collagen renewal.
Microneedling for Acne Scars and Overall Texture
Microneedling, a mechanical nonablative skin treatment, excels in improving acne scars, enlarged pores, and uneven surface texture. Using ultra-fine sterile needles, it creates micro-channels that activate the body’s natural wound-healing response, promoting new collagen and elastin formation.
Unlike laser therapies, microneedling doesn’t remove skin layers or rely on heat, which makes it safer for all skin tones, including skin of color and those prone to hyperpigmentation. This makes it ideal for patients with active acne or sensitive skin, where ablative lasers may not be suitable.
Results are gradual but cumulative. Most patients notice visible improvements after a few sessions spaced 4–6 weeks apart, with skin continuing to refine in texture, firmness, and tone over time.
Adding radiofrequency (RF) microneedling enhances skin tightening by delivering controlled heat energy deeper into the dermis for more pronounced lifting and contouring benefits.
Clinical Studies Comparing Both Treatments
Clinical studies show that erbium laser resurfacing delivers faster, more dramatic results for wrinkles, photoaging, and pigmentation than microneedling. Its specific laser wavelength targets water in the skin, vaporising damaged tissue and powerfully stimulating collagen, but with longer downtime and stricter aftercare.
By contrast, microneedling vs laser research finds microneedling offers safer, gradual improvements, especially for skin of color or sensitive skin. Nonablative lasers like Thulium and Nd:YAG provide a middle ground, stronger collagen stimulation than microneedling but milder recovery than CO2 or erbium laser treatments.
Combination Treatment Outcomes in Studies
Recent research shows that combining microneedling and laser treatments delivers superior results compared to using either alone. Sequential sessions, starting with microneedling for collagen stimulation and followed by fractional erbium laser for surface refinement, improve texture, tone, and firmness with reduced downtime.
This hybrid method blends the resurfacing power of ablative lasers with the comfort of nonablative techniques, addressing both surface and deeper issues like atrophic acne scars.
A 2017 clinical study found that alternating ablative fractional laser and RF microneedling produced significantly better improvement in atrophic acne scars than ablative laser alone, demonstrating the enhanced benefits of combination treatment.
Safety and Suitability for Different Skin Types
Skin tone, sensitivity, and underlying conditions are key considerations when choosing between microneedling and laser treatments. While both procedures enhance collagen and improve texture, their safety profiles differ depending on pigmentation levels, healing response, and skin sensitivity. Selecting the right option ensures a balance between visible results and minimal risk of complications such as pigmentation or irritation.
Erbium Laser on Fair vs Darker Skin Tones
The erbium laser is considered safer for skin of color compared to the traditional CO2 laser, as it produces less residual heat and limits the chance of thermal injury. However, when used too aggressively, especially in high-energy or fractional ablative modes, it can still trigger post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in darker skin tones.
Erbium laser for brown skin has shown positive outcomes when performed at conservative settings, as its precision allows targeted resurfacing with minimal risk of pigment alteration. Fair to medium skin types generally tolerate erbium laser resurfacing well, particularly when performed as fractional resurfacing or non-ablative laser treatment, which preserves part of the epidermis to reduce downtime and pigment risk.
For patients with deeper complexions, lighter settings and experienced providers are crucial to achieving safe, effective treatment outcomes. In summary, erbium is more forgiving than CO2 lasers, but for individuals with skin of color, microneedling remains the safer first-line option when comparing microneedling versus laser procedures.
Why Microneedling Is Often Preferred for Sensitive Skin
Microneedling uses fine, sterile needles to stimulate collagen production without heat, light energy, or ablation, making it ideal for those with high skin sensitivity or skin of color. Because it doesn’t rely on thermal injury, it significantly reduces the risk of hyperpigmentation, scarring, or prolonged redness, side effects that can occur with fractional ablative lasers.
This makes microneedling suitable for darker skin tones, rosacea-prone individuals, and those with active acne, who may not tolerate heat-based devices well. It’s also a preferred option for patients seeking effective treatment with low risk and quick recovery.
However, when combined strategically with laser skin resurfacing, microneedling can amplify collagen synthesis and overall results. This microneedling and laser skin resurfacing combination delivers the resurfacing precision of laser therapy with the dermal remodeling benefits of mechanical stimulation.
Who Should Avoid Erbium Laser or Microneedling
While both treatments are generally safe, some individuals should avoid undergoing microneedling or laser sessions to prevent complications or delayed healing. You should postpone or avoid treatment if:
- You have active acne, infections, eczema, or open wounds in the treatment area.
- You are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- You’ve recently used isotretinoin (Accutane) within the past 6–12 months.
- You have uncontrolled inflammatory skin conditions, such as psoriasis or dermatitis.
Patients prone to keloid formation or delayed healing should also consult their provider before choosing between microneedling and laser options. For these cases, gentler non-ablative laser treatments or surface-level microneedling are safer alternatives.
Potential Side Effects and How to Minimize Them
Both microneedling and laser procedures carry some temporary side effects, though intensity and recovery differ. Proper aftercare and sun protection minimize risks and support healthy healing.
Redness:
- Erbium Laser: 5–10 days, especially with fractional ablative modes
- Microneedling: 1–2 days of mild pinkness
- Prevention & Care: Keep skin moisturized; avoid heat and saunas
Swelling:
- Erbium Laser: Moderate, lasts up to a week
- Microneedling: Mild and short-lived
- Prevention & Care: Use cold compresses and gentle skincare
Pigmentation:
- Erbium Laser: Possible in darker tones or skin of colour if laser used aggressively
- Microneedling: Very rare
- Prevention & Care: Apply SPF 50+, avoid direct sun exposure
Infection Risk:
- Erbium Laser: Slight, due to open channels after laser resurfacing
- Microneedling: Minimal when clean needles are used
- Prevention & Care: Maintain hygiene and follow all post-care steps
Skin Sensitivity:
- Erbium Laser: Common during first week after fractional resurfacing
- Microneedling: Mild, usually subsides within 48 hours
- Prevention & Care: Avoid harsh actives or exfoliants until skin heals
Longevity of Results: How Long Each Treatment Lasts
Both erbium laser resurfacing and microneedling deliver long-term improvements in skin tone and texture, but their results depend on treatment depth, maintenance, and how well the skin is cared for afterward. The body continues to remodel collagen for months post-procedure, but ongoing maintenance ensures lasting rejuvenation.
How Long Erbium Laser Results Typically Last
Results from erbium laser and other fractional resurfacing procedures usually last 12–24 months, depending on lifestyle, age, and skincare habits. The erbium resurfacing results timeline varies from person to person, as the laser’s ablative or non-ablative modes stimulate deep collagen renewal that continues for several months after healing, gradually tightening and refining the skin.
Improvements in fine lines, pigmentation, and texture often persist well beyond a year, particularly with regular hydration and sun protection. Compared to fractional CO2 laser resurfacing or ruby laser systems, erbium provides a similar level of long-term rejuvenation but with shorter downtime, making it an excellent option for patients with skin sensitivity or skin of color when performed using milder, non-ablative laser treatment settings.
How Often Should You Repeat Microneedling for Lasting Results?
Microneedling provides steady, buildable improvement that peaks over multiple sessions. For best outcomes, most patients undergo 3–6 sessions, spaced 4–6 weeks apart, followed by maintenance every 6–12 months.
Individuals treated with microneedling for rolling scars, enlarged pores, or mild wrinkles often combine it with non-ablative fractional laser treatments for extended collagen stimulation and smoother results.
This combination works well for those with skin sensitivity or previous fractional CO2 laser resurfacing, offering visible tightening and renewal without the downtime of a fully ablative procedure.
Factors That Affect How Long Results Last (Lifestyle, Age, Skin Care Routine)
The durability of your results, whether from erbium laser, microneedling, or non-ablative fractional treatments, depends on how you protect and nourish your skin afterward.
- Sun exposure: Chronic UV damage breaks down collagen, fading results sooner. Daily SPF and hats are essential to preserve the effects of microneedling and laser skin resurfacing.
- Skincare routine: Using antioxidants, retinoids, and hydrating serums strengthens collagen fibers and prolongs post-treatment glow. Products similar to microneedling benefits, such as peptide-rich creams, help maintain elasticity.
- Age and skin health: Younger patients typically experience longer-lasting outcomes due to faster collagen turnover, while older individuals may require more frequent touch-ups.
- Lifestyle habits: Smoking, stress, and poor sleep accelerate aging, reducing longevity. Maintaining hydration, nutrition, and gentle exfoliation supports long-term renewal.
Ultimately, both fractional resurfacing and microneedling can yield enduring results when combined with a consistent non-ablative laser treatment maintenance plan and disciplined aftercare.
Cost Comparison: Erbium Laser vs Microneedling Treatments
The cost of erbium laser resurfacing and microneedling depends on multiple factors, including treatment intensity, device technology, practitioner expertise, and the type of skin concern being treated. While both improve skin texture and stimulate skin regeneration, they differ in price structure, treatment frequency, and the speed of results.
Average Price Range and Session Costs
The overall cost of microneedling and laser skin resurfacing depends on the technology used, practitioner experience, and treatment area. While both target skin regeneration and the appearance of scars, erbium laser delivers faster, deeper results, whereas microneedling may offer gradual improvement with multiple sessions.
The following outlines the average UK pricing and treatment frequency for both procedures:
Erbium Laser Resurfacing:
- Average Cost: £750–£2,500 per session
- Sessions Required: 1–2
- Best For: Deep wrinkles, pigmentation, atrophic scars, overall skin regeneration
Microneedling:
- Average Cost: £200–£500 per session
- Sessions Required: 3–6
- Best For: Mild scarring, ice pick scars, texture refinement, early ageing
Note: All prices are based on UK averages from private dermatology and aesthetic clinics as of 2025. Costs vary depending on practitioner expertise, device type, and treatment area size.)
In short, erbium laser provides quicker, more dramatic rejuvenation, similar to fractional CO2 laser resurfacing, while microneedling offers a slower but more affordable route to smoother, refined skin texture with minimal downtime.
Value Over Time and Maintenance Requirements
Erbium laser resurfacing has a higher upfront cost but offers longer-lasting results, often maintaining improvement for 12–24 months or more. This is because it works deeply to remove damaged skin layers and stimulate new collagen. For patients with atrophic scars or deep textural irregularities, this long-term benefit often justifies the cost.
Microneedling, on the other hand, relies on cumulative collagen stimulation through repeated sessions. Although it is more affordable per visit, total costs can match a single ablative fractional laser treatment when factoring in maintenance. Still, microneedling is ideal for ongoing skin regeneration and steady improvement without extended downtime or high single-session fees.
Factors That Influence Cost (Technology, Practitioner Expertise, Treatment Area Size)
The total price of microneedling or laser procedures depends on several key elements:
- Technology Used: Advanced systems like fractional erbium YAG, pulsed dye laser, or alexandrite laser tend to cost more due to their precision and ability to treat pigmentation, redness, or vascular issues alongside resurfacing.
- Practitioner Expertise: Treatments performed by experienced dermatologists or laser specialists often come at a premium but ensure better results and safety.
- Treatment Area Size: A full-face microneedling and laser session costs more than targeting smaller areas such as the cheeks or acne-scar zones.
Patients treating atrophic or boxcar scars may also require deeper fractional resurfacing, slightly increasing cost but greatly enhancing the final result.
Cost vs Value: When Paying More Is Worth It
When comparing microneedling vs laser, consider the balance between investment, recovery, and outcome. If you’re seeking a dramatic transformation in fewer sessions, such as for deep wrinkles, pigmentation, or long-standing acne scars, the erbium laser or another ablative fractional laser offers better value for its comprehensive resurfacing and lasting impact.
However, for those who prefer a gradual, low-risk, and budget-friendly approach, microneedling remains an excellent choice. It’s especially effective for improving the appearance of scars, refining pores, and enhancing skin texture over time.
Ultimately, both treatments promote skin regeneration and collagen renewal, but your choice depends on the type of scars (from ice pick to atrophic) and how quickly you want visible results. For long-term rejuvenation and fewer sessions, the erbium laser is worth the higher investment, while microneedling delivers steady, progressive improvement at a manageable cost.
Combining Erbium Laser and Microneedling for Enhanced Results
Combining erbium laser resurfacing with microneedling delivers deeper collagen renewal and smoother skin texture. Microneedling stimulates healing within the skin, while the erbium fractional laser refines surface tone and brightness.
Studies show this combo improves fine lines, scars, and pigmentation more effectively than either treatment alone, promoting faster skin regeneration and longer-lasting rejuvenation with minimal downtime.
When Combination Therapy Is Recommended
Pairing erbium laser resurfacing with microneedling is often the best treatment for patients who need multi-layer skin correction, particularly for fine lines and wrinkles, mixed atrophic acne scarring, enlarged pores, and photo-damage. This approach targets both the epidermis and dermis for complete skin regeneration.
Clinical research in Dermatologic Therapy and Lasers in Surgery and Medicine supports combining fractional erbium:YAG laser with biologic stimulators such as microneedling with PRP, which enhances collagen production and speeds recovery.
By treating both the surface and deeper dermal structures, combination therapy can correct stubborn scarring and skin texture irregularities more effectively than single-modality treatments. It’s especially useful for patients seeking visible rejuvenation without the extended downtime of fully ablative procedures.
How Practitioners Sequence Treatments Safely
In practice, microneedling often comes first (with or without PRP) to activate dermal fibroblasts and stimulate collagen remodeling within the skin, followed a few weeks later by fractional non-ablative erbium laser or low-fluence resurfacing for precise surface refinement.
This layered method reduces cumulative heat exposure and minimizes risks like hyperpigmentation, especially in skin of color. Scientific reviews highlight that erbium:YAG lasers cause less residual thermal damage than CO2 laser therapy, allowing safer sequencing in combination plans.
Moreover, microneedling with PRP has strong meta-analytic backing for treating acne scars, while erbium:YAG demonstrates proven safety and efficacy in improving wrinkles, pigmentation, and photoaging with predictable healing outcomes.
How to Space Treatments for Optimal Healing
Most dermatologists recommend spacing treatments by 4–6 weeks to allow full collagen remodeling and epidermal repair before introducing laser energy. This period aligns with the natural healing phases, microneedling initiates micro-injury repair and neocollagenesis, while erbium laser treatment then resurfaces the top layers for visible smoothness.
Guidelines from hospital and NHS dermatology departments emphasize allowing the skin to recover fully between sessions to reduce infection risk and inflammation. Proper spacing also ensures that results build gradually and safely, giving patients smoother texture, balanced tone, and stronger collagen integrity with each cycle.
Expected Results from Combination Therapy (Timeline + Benefits)
By combining modalities, laser therapy may deliver immediate surface smoothing while needling sustains deeper remodeling. Studies and reviews report:
- Smoother, tighter skin and reduced pores/irregularities within 2–3 months.
- Better acne-scar outcomes when erbium (or other fractional lasers) is layered with needling/PRP versus monotherapy.
- Comparable or faster texture restoration than single treatments, with manageable downtime when erbium is used fractionally/low-fluence.
- Evidence spans RCTs and meta-analyses of microneedling may + PRP for scars, fractional erbium combinations, and RF-microneedling literature showing broad safety across skin types.
Which Treatment Is Better for You?
Choosing the right approach, whether microneedling, erbium laser, or a combination, depends on your skin goals, downtime tolerance, and budget. Microneedling cost is lower and ideal when you’re focusing on improving texture or acne scarring that may need gradual repair.
If you want a deeper impact like reducing fine lines and wrinkles or major skin-surface changes, then laser therapy may be a stronger fit. Government and clinical guidance on laser resurfacing emphasises tailoring treatment based on skin type and condition.
Why Consultation with a Professional Matters Most
Choosing between microneedling or laser shouldn’t be done without professional input. Dermatologists assess not just your visible skin issues but the underlying structural concerns within the skin, including collagen density, pigmentation risk, and past treatment history.
According to research published by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (PubMed), expert evaluation ensures safer, more predictable results and helps avoid complications like post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), especially in patients with skin of color.
A professional will also determine the ideal course of treatment,for instance, multiple microneedling sessions for collagen induction versus one or two erbium laser sessions for resurfacing. They can explain how each option interacts with your unique biology, helping you choose the best approach for your skin health and long-term improvement.
Real-World Scenarios; When Each Treatment Works Best
- Microneedling is great for younger patients or those with mild acne scarring, textural irregularities, or early signs of ageing. It improves the appearance of scars and fine lines through controlled micro-injury that activates collagen synthesis over time.
- Erbium or fractional CO2 laser resurfacing is ideal for deeper atrophic scars, severe photodamage, and more advanced aging. Because the erbium laser’s light energy is absorbed by the skin’s water molecules, it removes damaged cells and triggers rapid new tissue formation.
- Combination treatments, starting with microneedling and following with fractional erbium, work best for patients wanting significant resurfacing while limiting downtime. This approach smooths scarring and skin texture, tightens pores, and refines pigmentation for balanced rejuvenation.
A 2020 clinical study published in Dermatologic Therapy found that combining microneedling with fractional laser resurfacing significantly enhanced collagen remodeling and produced stronger long-term skin-strengthening results compared to using either treatment alone.
Expert Recommendation from the Institute of Medical Physics
At the Institute of Medical Physics, founded by Dr. Emanuel Paleco, each treatment plan is customized to balance safety, effectiveness, and recovery. For patients focused on natural improvement with minimal interruption, microneedling often provides excellent results, especially when combined with PRP or a light non-ablative laser treatment.
For more advanced rejuvenation, fractional ablative erbium laser therapy is recommended, it removes surface irregularities, boosts elasticity, and enhances clarity for those seeking a single, transformative session. Patients with deep scars or long-term sun damage may benefit most from a course of treatment alternating both modalities.
Ultimately, the clinic’s guidance emphasizes that both options can be highly effective, microneedling for gradual, cost-efficient collagen renewal and erbium laser for faster, high-impact resurfacing. By consulting a qualified practitioner, patients ensure that their treatment safely targets issues deep within the skin while improving overall texture, tone, and radiance.
Before You Go…
Achieving lasting results from erbium laser resurfacing or microneedling goes beyond the procedure, it depends on how you prepare, heal, and care for your skin afterward. The best outcomes come from working with a qualified specialist, following a tailored skincare plan, and maintaining consistent post-care.
Every choice, from practitioner expertise to daily sun protection, affects how long your skin stays smooth, firm, and radiant. Proper hydration, SPF, and gentle skincare help preserve collagen renewal deep within the skin, extending your glow for months to come.
About the Institute of Medical Physics
Founded by Dr. Emanuel Paleco, the Institute of Medical Physics is a leading UK centre for Medical and Aesthetic Laser Science, with clinics in King’s Cross, North London, and Essex. The Institute specialises in erbium fractional laser resurfacing, microneedling with PRP, and other evidence-based skin regeneration therapies.
Dr. Paleco’s team combines medical precision with advanced technology to restore skin texture and tone safely and effectively.
Book your consultation to experience expert, science-led care designed to achieve natural, long-lasting skin rejuvenation.
FAQs
How does Erbium Laser compare to CO2 Laser Resurfacing?
Erbium laser heals faster and causes less heat damage, while CO2 laser resurfacing penetrates deeper for stronger resurfacing results but requires longer downtime.
Is Microneedling as effective as CO2 Laser for acne scars?
Microneedling offers gradual improvement for mild acne scarring, while fractional CO2 laser resurfacing delivers faster, more dramatic results for deeper scars.
Can I combine Microneedling and Fractional CO2 Laser for better results?
Yes. Combining microneedling and fractional CO2 targets multiple skin layers, needling boosts collagen within the skin, while laser energy refines the surface.
Which treatment improves overall skin tone and firmness best?
Fractional CO2 laser resurfacing tightens and brightens skin quickly, while microneedling and nonablative fractional lasers gradually enhance elasticity and tone.
How do I choose between CO2 Laser and Microneedling for my skin type?
For deeper resurfacing, CO2 laser works best; for sensitive or darker skin, microneedling offers safer rejuvenation with less risk and downtime.

Is Erbium Laser Better Than Microneedling? A Complete Comparison Guide
Erbium laser resurfacing and microneedling both rejuvenate the skin by boosting collagen, improving tone, and refining texture, but they work in very different ways.
The erbium laser uses light energy absorbed by the skin to remove damaged layers and resurface deeply, offering faster, more dramatic results for wrinkles and pigmentation.
Microneedling creates micro-injuries within the skin to trigger natural collagen repair. It’s gentler, non-ablative, and ideal for darker or sensitive skin with minimal downtime.
This guide compares microneedling vs erbium laser to help you choose the best option based on your skin goals, recovery time, and desired results.

%20(6).png)
Key Takeaways
- Erbium laser offers deeper, faster resurfacing for wrinkles and pigmentation.
- Microneedling is gentler and safe for sensitive or darker skin.
- Erbium laser provides dramatic results, while microneedling builds gradual improvement.
- Microneedling suits maintenance, and erbium laser suits full rejuvenation.
- Combining both treatments enhances collagen and long-term skin renewal.
Understanding the Difference Between Erbium Laser and Microneedling
While both treatments aim to refine skin tone and texture, they function very differently beneath the surface. Knowing the mechanism of each helps you choose the right option for your skin’s needs and recovery tolerance.
Erbium laser resurfacing, a precise form of laser treatment, uses controlled light energy to remove damaged skin cells and trigger deep collagen renewal, offering faster and more targeted rejuvenation.
Microneedling versus laser treatments comes down to how they create controlled skin injury: lasers use light energy, while microneedling uses fine mechanical punctures. Both initiate a similar wound-healing cascade, collagen and elastin synthesis, but with different levels of precision and depth.
How Erbium Laser Works for Skin Resurfacing
Erbium laser is a highly targeted laser treatment that uses precise light energy absorbed by water in the skin to vaporise damaged cells layer by layer. This ablative laser approach physically removes the outer layers while stimulating collagen regeneration deep in the dermis.
Depending on the goal, dermatologists may use a fractional laser (treating micro-columns of skin for faster recovery) or a fully ablative laser (treating the entire surface for dramatic renewal). The healing process typically lasts one to two weeks, as new skin forms and old tissue sheds.
Compared to the CO2 laser, erbium is gentler and causes less thermal injury, making it ideal for patients seeking noticeable resurfacing with a shorter downtime. The result: smoother, tighter, more even skin once the tissue regenerates.
How Microneedling Stimulates Natural Collagen Repair
Microneedling, also known as collagen-induction therapy, uses ultra-fine sterile needles to create micro-channels in the skin. These controlled punctures trigger the body’s natural healing response, stimulating fibroblasts to produce new collagen and elastin without removing surface layers.
Unlike ablative or fractional lasers, microneedling is a non-ablative approach, meaning the epidermis stays intact. This makes it safer for all skin tones, including darker or reactive types, and reduces the chance of pigmentation or extended downtime.
The healing process after microneedling is mild, typically 24–72 hours of redness or tightness, compared to a week or more for laser resurfacing treatments like erbium or CO2 laser.
The Science Behind Collagen Remodeling in Both Treatments
Both microneedling and laser therapies work by stimulating collagen, but the method and intensity differ:
- Erbium laser directly heats the dermis using concentrated light, causing collagen contraction and new synthesis for rapid tightening.
- Microneedling, by contrast, relies on micro-wound healing to gradually remodel tissue through repeated sessions.
In microneedling vs laser resurfacing, the laser induces a stronger, faster response due to controlled thermal energy, while microneedling achieves progressive improvement with little downtime.
Some clinics even combine them, performing microneedling and laser alternately, to balance short-term rejuvenation with long-term collagen strengthening. This hybrid approach blends the depth of fractional laser energy with the restorative benefits of mechanical collagen induction.
Comparing Ablative vs Non-Ablative Technologies
When deciding between microneedling vs erbium laser, understanding how ablative and non-ablative technologies differ is essential. Both methods target collagen regeneration but through distinct mechanisms, recovery times, and depths of treatment.
Ablative lasers, such as the erbium laser or CO2 laser, remove precise layers of damaged skin to resurface and renew from the inside out. They deliver more dramatic results in fewer sessions but require a longer healing process.
Non-ablative treatments like microneedling stimulate collagen production beneath the surface without removing the epidermis. The result is gradual rejuvenation, minimal downtime, and a safer option for a broader range of skin types.
To understand how these two treatments differ in intensity, results, and downtime, here’s a quick comparison between Erbium laser (ablative/fractional) and microneedling (non-ablative):
Erbium Laser (Ablative / Fractional Laser)
- Ablative laser removes outer skin layers for resurfacing.
- Uses light energy to vaporize damaged cells and stimulate collagen.
- Targets both epidermis and dermis for dramatic resurfacing.
- Healing takes 5–10 days with redness and peeling.
- Results are fast and visible after one session.
- Downtime is moderate to high.
- Best for wrinkles, pigmentation, scars, and uneven skin tone/texture.
- Summary: Provides dramatic resurfacing results.
Microneedling (Non-Ablative)
- Creates micro-injuries without removing skin (non-ablative).
- Uses fine needles to trigger natural collagen repair.
- Works within the dermis to rejuvenate skin from within.
- Healing involves mild redness and tightness for 1–3 days.
- Results build gradually over multiple sessions.
- Downtime is minimal; most resume normal activity within 24 hours.
- Best for mild scarring, enlarged pores, and early signs of aging.
- Summary: Rejuvenates naturally with less downtime.
Key Differences: Erbium Laser vs Microneedling
While both skin treatments enhance overall tone, texture, and collagen production, the strength, precision, and recovery experience between microneedling vs laser therapies differ significantly. Understanding these distinctions helps you choose the right approach for your individual goals, whether you want full resurfacing or subtle rejuvenation.
Depth of Treatment and Precision Control
The erbium laser is a highly advanced specific laser system that allows dermatologists to target controlled depths with sub-millimetre accuracy. As an ablative laser, it removes precise layers of damaged tissue, making it ideal for addressing fine lines, deeper wrinkles, and stubborn pigmentation. When used fractionally, it leaves surrounding skin intact for faster recovery while still delivering strong skin tightening effects.
In contrast, microneedling creates controlled mechanical punctures, typically 0.25–2.5 mm deep, to stimulate collagen and elastin production. It does not remove tissue, making it a nonablative and minimally invasive alternative suitable for all skin types, including skin of color.
However, it is less precise than fractional or CO2 laser resurfacing and achieves more gradual improvements through repeated sessions.
Skin Concerns Each Treatment Targets Best
Each method has unique advantages depending on the condition treated. The table below highlights which treatment options perform best for common concerns:
Erbium Laser
- Excellent for reducing fine lines, wrinkles, pigmentation, and uneven skin tone.
- Strong efficacy on acne scars, enlarged pores, and texture irregularities.
- Moderate improvement in stretch marks.
- Not suitable during active acne breakouts.
- Requires expert settings for skin of color or uses nonablative mode to avoid complications.
- Works by ablative resurfacing, removing damaged skin layers and stimulating collagen.
- Offers fast, visible results with moderate to high downtime.
- Personalized treatment options for various skin types and concerns.
- Short recovery period compared to other ablative lasers.
- Can be combined with other therapies for enhanced effects.
Microneedling
- Moderate improvement in fine lines, wrinkles, pigmentation, and uneven tone.
- Strong effectiveness on acne scars, enlarged pores, and overall skin texture.
- Excellent for stretch marks.
- Can be adapted safely for mild acne-prone skin and darker skin tones.
- Non-ablative with minimal downtime, triggering collagen through micro-injuries.
- Gradual results build over multiple sessions.
- Less invasive and suitable for patients seeking natural rejuvenation with shorter recovery.
Erbium and CO2 laser resurfacing options are particularly powerful for resurfacing texture irregularities, while microneedling is gentler and safer for those prone to hyperpigmentation or post-inflammatory reactions.
Downtime, Pain Level, and Recovery Experience
Recovery experiences between these laser therapies and mechanical treatments differ greatly. Erbium laser resurfacing typically requires 5–10 days of downtime, depending on the depth and whether it’s a fractional or full ablative procedure.
Redness, peeling, and warmth are expected as part of the healing process, and numbing cream or mild sedation is often used for comfort. Patients usually see dramatic renewal in skin tone and texture once healing completes.
By contrast, microneedling has a shorter recovery, usually 24–72 hours of mild redness and tightness. Only topical anaesthetic is needed, and most patients resume normal activities within a day. While microneedling vs laser downtime differs, both benefit from diligent post-procedure care and sun avoidance to protect new skin as collagen rebuilds.
Customization and Device Variations (Fractional, RF Microneedling, etc.)
Modern laser therapies and microneedling devices can be customised to match skin type and concern severity.
- Erbium laser: Available in multiple modes, including fractional erbium YAG for controlled ablation with shorter downtime and full ablative laser settings for intensive resurfacing. Some clinics also offer glass laser systems and CO2 laser resurfacing, which penetrate deeper for significant wrinkle and scar correction but require longer recovery.
- Microneedling: Variations such as radiofrequency (RF) microneedling combine mechanical stimulation with heat energy, promoting firmer, tighter skin and deeper collagen renewal. RF-assisted devices provide noticeable skin tightening and contouring benefits compared to standard microneedling.
Both microneedling and laser methods can be adjusted by depth, density, and energy to balance comfort, downtime, and result intensity.
Effectiveness: Which Delivers Better Results?
Both microneedling and erbium laser resurfacing are clinically proven skin treatments that improve skin tone and texture, boost collagen, and reduce visible signs of aging. However, their intensity, rate of improvement, and overall results differ significantly.
While laser therapies like erbium offer faster transformation through controlled ablation, microneedling provides gradual, buildable results with minimal risk and downtime.
Erbium Laser for Fine Lines, Wrinkles, and Pigmentation
Erbium laser resurfacing remains one of the most advanced laser treatment options for addressing fine lines, deep wrinkles, and severe sun damage. This ablative laser removes micro-thin layers of damaged skin, stimulating new cell turnover and collagen remodeling for dramatic rejuvenation.
The erbium laser treats concerns such as uneven skin tone, sun-induced pigmentation, and early age-related changes. Its precise technology allows controlled resurfacing with minimal thermal damage, making it an excellent option for patients seeking visible rejuvenation with shorter recovery time.
Within just one or two sessions, patients can see visible improvements in skin tone and texture, reduced pigmentation, and firmer, more even skin. Erbium also performs well on atrophic acne scars, restoring smoother contours and improved elasticity through deep collagen renewal.
Microneedling for Acne Scars and Overall Texture
Microneedling, a mechanical nonablative skin treatment, excels in improving acne scars, enlarged pores, and uneven surface texture. Using ultra-fine sterile needles, it creates micro-channels that activate the body’s natural wound-healing response, promoting new collagen and elastin formation.
Unlike laser therapies, microneedling doesn’t remove skin layers or rely on heat, which makes it safer for all skin tones, including skin of color and those prone to hyperpigmentation. This makes it ideal for patients with active acne or sensitive skin, where ablative lasers may not be suitable.
Results are gradual but cumulative. Most patients notice visible improvements after a few sessions spaced 4–6 weeks apart, with skin continuing to refine in texture, firmness, and tone over time.
Adding radiofrequency (RF) microneedling enhances skin tightening by delivering controlled heat energy deeper into the dermis for more pronounced lifting and contouring benefits.
Clinical Studies Comparing Both Treatments
Clinical studies show that erbium laser resurfacing delivers faster, more dramatic results for wrinkles, photoaging, and pigmentation than microneedling. Its specific laser wavelength targets water in the skin, vaporising damaged tissue and powerfully stimulating collagen, but with longer downtime and stricter aftercare.
By contrast, microneedling vs laser research finds microneedling offers safer, gradual improvements, especially for skin of color or sensitive skin. Nonablative lasers like Thulium and Nd:YAG provide a middle ground, stronger collagen stimulation than microneedling but milder recovery than CO2 or erbium laser treatments.
Combination Treatment Outcomes in Studies
Recent research shows that combining microneedling and laser treatments delivers superior results compared to using either alone. Sequential sessions, starting with microneedling for collagen stimulation and followed by fractional erbium laser for surface refinement, improve texture, tone, and firmness with reduced downtime.
This hybrid method blends the resurfacing power of ablative lasers with the comfort of nonablative techniques, addressing both surface and deeper issues like atrophic acne scars.
A 2017 clinical study found that alternating ablative fractional laser and RF microneedling produced significantly better improvement in atrophic acne scars than ablative laser alone, demonstrating the enhanced benefits of combination treatment.
Safety and Suitability for Different Skin Types
Skin tone, sensitivity, and underlying conditions are key considerations when choosing between microneedling and laser treatments. While both procedures enhance collagen and improve texture, their safety profiles differ depending on pigmentation levels, healing response, and skin sensitivity. Selecting the right option ensures a balance between visible results and minimal risk of complications such as pigmentation or irritation.
Erbium Laser on Fair vs Darker Skin Tones
The erbium laser is considered safer for skin of color compared to the traditional CO2 laser, as it produces less residual heat and limits the chance of thermal injury. However, when used too aggressively, especially in high-energy or fractional ablative modes, it can still trigger post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in darker skin tones.
Erbium laser for brown skin has shown positive outcomes when performed at conservative settings, as its precision allows targeted resurfacing with minimal risk of pigment alteration. Fair to medium skin types generally tolerate erbium laser resurfacing well, particularly when performed as fractional resurfacing or non-ablative laser treatment, which preserves part of the epidermis to reduce downtime and pigment risk.
For patients with deeper complexions, lighter settings and experienced providers are crucial to achieving safe, effective treatment outcomes. In summary, erbium is more forgiving than CO2 lasers, but for individuals with skin of color, microneedling remains the safer first-line option when comparing microneedling versus laser procedures.
Why Microneedling Is Often Preferred for Sensitive Skin
Microneedling uses fine, sterile needles to stimulate collagen production without heat, light energy, or ablation, making it ideal for those with high skin sensitivity or skin of color. Because it doesn’t rely on thermal injury, it significantly reduces the risk of hyperpigmentation, scarring, or prolonged redness, side effects that can occur with fractional ablative lasers.
This makes microneedling suitable for darker skin tones, rosacea-prone individuals, and those with active acne, who may not tolerate heat-based devices well. It’s also a preferred option for patients seeking effective treatment with low risk and quick recovery.
However, when combined strategically with laser skin resurfacing, microneedling can amplify collagen synthesis and overall results. This microneedling and laser skin resurfacing combination delivers the resurfacing precision of laser therapy with the dermal remodeling benefits of mechanical stimulation.
Who Should Avoid Erbium Laser or Microneedling
While both treatments are generally safe, some individuals should avoid undergoing microneedling or laser sessions to prevent complications or delayed healing. You should postpone or avoid treatment if:
- You have active acne, infections, eczema, or open wounds in the treatment area.
- You are pregnant or breastfeeding.
- You’ve recently used isotretinoin (Accutane) within the past 6–12 months.
- You have uncontrolled inflammatory skin conditions, such as psoriasis or dermatitis.
Patients prone to keloid formation or delayed healing should also consult their provider before choosing between microneedling and laser options. For these cases, gentler non-ablative laser treatments or surface-level microneedling are safer alternatives.
Potential Side Effects and How to Minimize Them
Both microneedling and laser procedures carry some temporary side effects, though intensity and recovery differ. Proper aftercare and sun protection minimize risks and support healthy healing.
Redness:
- Erbium Laser: 5–10 days, especially with fractional ablative modes
- Microneedling: 1–2 days of mild pinkness
- Prevention & Care: Keep skin moisturized; avoid heat and saunas
Swelling:
- Erbium Laser: Moderate, lasts up to a week
- Microneedling: Mild and short-lived
- Prevention & Care: Use cold compresses and gentle skincare
Pigmentation:
- Erbium Laser: Possible in darker tones or skin of colour if laser used aggressively
- Microneedling: Very rare
- Prevention & Care: Apply SPF 50+, avoid direct sun exposure
Infection Risk:
- Erbium Laser: Slight, due to open channels after laser resurfacing
- Microneedling: Minimal when clean needles are used
- Prevention & Care: Maintain hygiene and follow all post-care steps
Skin Sensitivity:
- Erbium Laser: Common during first week after fractional resurfacing
- Microneedling: Mild, usually subsides within 48 hours
- Prevention & Care: Avoid harsh actives or exfoliants until skin heals
Longevity of Results: How Long Each Treatment Lasts
Both erbium laser resurfacing and microneedling deliver long-term improvements in skin tone and texture, but their results depend on treatment depth, maintenance, and how well the skin is cared for afterward. The body continues to remodel collagen for months post-procedure, but ongoing maintenance ensures lasting rejuvenation.
How Long Erbium Laser Results Typically Last
Results from erbium laser and other fractional resurfacing procedures usually last 12–24 months, depending on lifestyle, age, and skincare habits. The erbium resurfacing results timeline varies from person to person, as the laser’s ablative or non-ablative modes stimulate deep collagen renewal that continues for several months after healing, gradually tightening and refining the skin.
Improvements in fine lines, pigmentation, and texture often persist well beyond a year, particularly with regular hydration and sun protection. Compared to fractional CO2 laser resurfacing or ruby laser systems, erbium provides a similar level of long-term rejuvenation but with shorter downtime, making it an excellent option for patients with skin sensitivity or skin of color when performed using milder, non-ablative laser treatment settings.
How Often Should You Repeat Microneedling for Lasting Results?
Microneedling provides steady, buildable improvement that peaks over multiple sessions. For best outcomes, most patients undergo 3–6 sessions, spaced 4–6 weeks apart, followed by maintenance every 6–12 months.
Individuals treated with microneedling for rolling scars, enlarged pores, or mild wrinkles often combine it with non-ablative fractional laser treatments for extended collagen stimulation and smoother results.
This combination works well for those with skin sensitivity or previous fractional CO2 laser resurfacing, offering visible tightening and renewal without the downtime of a fully ablative procedure.
Factors That Affect How Long Results Last (Lifestyle, Age, Skin Care Routine)
The durability of your results, whether from erbium laser, microneedling, or non-ablative fractional treatments, depends on how you protect and nourish your skin afterward.
- Sun exposure: Chronic UV damage breaks down collagen, fading results sooner. Daily SPF and hats are essential to preserve the effects of microneedling and laser skin resurfacing.
- Skincare routine: Using antioxidants, retinoids, and hydrating serums strengthens collagen fibers and prolongs post-treatment glow. Products similar to microneedling benefits, such as peptide-rich creams, help maintain elasticity.
- Age and skin health: Younger patients typically experience longer-lasting outcomes due to faster collagen turnover, while older individuals may require more frequent touch-ups.
- Lifestyle habits: Smoking, stress, and poor sleep accelerate aging, reducing longevity. Maintaining hydration, nutrition, and gentle exfoliation supports long-term renewal.
Ultimately, both fractional resurfacing and microneedling can yield enduring results when combined with a consistent non-ablative laser treatment maintenance plan and disciplined aftercare.
Cost Comparison: Erbium Laser vs Microneedling Treatments
The cost of erbium laser resurfacing and microneedling depends on multiple factors, including treatment intensity, device technology, practitioner expertise, and the type of skin concern being treated. While both improve skin texture and stimulate skin regeneration, they differ in price structure, treatment frequency, and the speed of results.
Average Price Range and Session Costs
The overall cost of microneedling and laser skin resurfacing depends on the technology used, practitioner experience, and treatment area. While both target skin regeneration and the appearance of scars, erbium laser delivers faster, deeper results, whereas microneedling may offer gradual improvement with multiple sessions.
The following outlines the average UK pricing and treatment frequency for both procedures:
Erbium Laser Resurfacing:
- Average Cost: £750–£2,500 per session
- Sessions Required: 1–2
- Best For: Deep wrinkles, pigmentation, atrophic scars, overall skin regeneration
Microneedling:
- Average Cost: £200–£500 per session
- Sessions Required: 3–6
- Best For: Mild scarring, ice pick scars, texture refinement, early ageing
Note: All prices are based on UK averages from private dermatology and aesthetic clinics as of 2025. Costs vary depending on practitioner expertise, device type, and treatment area size.)
In short, erbium laser provides quicker, more dramatic rejuvenation, similar to fractional CO2 laser resurfacing, while microneedling offers a slower but more affordable route to smoother, refined skin texture with minimal downtime.
Value Over Time and Maintenance Requirements
Erbium laser resurfacing has a higher upfront cost but offers longer-lasting results, often maintaining improvement for 12–24 months or more. This is because it works deeply to remove damaged skin layers and stimulate new collagen. For patients with atrophic scars or deep textural irregularities, this long-term benefit often justifies the cost.
Microneedling, on the other hand, relies on cumulative collagen stimulation through repeated sessions. Although it is more affordable per visit, total costs can match a single ablative fractional laser treatment when factoring in maintenance. Still, microneedling is ideal for ongoing skin regeneration and steady improvement without extended downtime or high single-session fees.
Factors That Influence Cost (Technology, Practitioner Expertise, Treatment Area Size)
The total price of microneedling or laser procedures depends on several key elements:
- Technology Used: Advanced systems like fractional erbium YAG, pulsed dye laser, or alexandrite laser tend to cost more due to their precision and ability to treat pigmentation, redness, or vascular issues alongside resurfacing.
- Practitioner Expertise: Treatments performed by experienced dermatologists or laser specialists often come at a premium but ensure better results and safety.
- Treatment Area Size: A full-face microneedling and laser session costs more than targeting smaller areas such as the cheeks or acne-scar zones.
Patients treating atrophic or boxcar scars may also require deeper fractional resurfacing, slightly increasing cost but greatly enhancing the final result.
Cost vs Value: When Paying More Is Worth It
When comparing microneedling vs laser, consider the balance between investment, recovery, and outcome. If you’re seeking a dramatic transformation in fewer sessions, such as for deep wrinkles, pigmentation, or long-standing acne scars, the erbium laser or another ablative fractional laser offers better value for its comprehensive resurfacing and lasting impact.
However, for those who prefer a gradual, low-risk, and budget-friendly approach, microneedling remains an excellent choice. It’s especially effective for improving the appearance of scars, refining pores, and enhancing skin texture over time.
Ultimately, both treatments promote skin regeneration and collagen renewal, but your choice depends on the type of scars (from ice pick to atrophic) and how quickly you want visible results. For long-term rejuvenation and fewer sessions, the erbium laser is worth the higher investment, while microneedling delivers steady, progressive improvement at a manageable cost.
Combining Erbium Laser and Microneedling for Enhanced Results
Combining erbium laser resurfacing with microneedling delivers deeper collagen renewal and smoother skin texture. Microneedling stimulates healing within the skin, while the erbium fractional laser refines surface tone and brightness.
Studies show this combo improves fine lines, scars, and pigmentation more effectively than either treatment alone, promoting faster skin regeneration and longer-lasting rejuvenation with minimal downtime.
When Combination Therapy Is Recommended
Pairing erbium laser resurfacing with microneedling is often the best treatment for patients who need multi-layer skin correction, particularly for fine lines and wrinkles, mixed atrophic acne scarring, enlarged pores, and photo-damage. This approach targets both the epidermis and dermis for complete skin regeneration.
Clinical research in Dermatologic Therapy and Lasers in Surgery and Medicine supports combining fractional erbium:YAG laser with biologic stimulators such as microneedling with PRP, which enhances collagen production and speeds recovery.
By treating both the surface and deeper dermal structures, combination therapy can correct stubborn scarring and skin texture irregularities more effectively than single-modality treatments. It’s especially useful for patients seeking visible rejuvenation without the extended downtime of fully ablative procedures.
How Practitioners Sequence Treatments Safely
In practice, microneedling often comes first (with or without PRP) to activate dermal fibroblasts and stimulate collagen remodeling within the skin, followed a few weeks later by fractional non-ablative erbium laser or low-fluence resurfacing for precise surface refinement.
This layered method reduces cumulative heat exposure and minimizes risks like hyperpigmentation, especially in skin of color. Scientific reviews highlight that erbium:YAG lasers cause less residual thermal damage than CO2 laser therapy, allowing safer sequencing in combination plans.
Moreover, microneedling with PRP has strong meta-analytic backing for treating acne scars, while erbium:YAG demonstrates proven safety and efficacy in improving wrinkles, pigmentation, and photoaging with predictable healing outcomes.
How to Space Treatments for Optimal Healing
Most dermatologists recommend spacing treatments by 4–6 weeks to allow full collagen remodeling and epidermal repair before introducing laser energy. This period aligns with the natural healing phases, microneedling initiates micro-injury repair and neocollagenesis, while erbium laser treatment then resurfaces the top layers for visible smoothness.
Guidelines from hospital and NHS dermatology departments emphasize allowing the skin to recover fully between sessions to reduce infection risk and inflammation. Proper spacing also ensures that results build gradually and safely, giving patients smoother texture, balanced tone, and stronger collagen integrity with each cycle.
Expected Results from Combination Therapy (Timeline + Benefits)
By combining modalities, laser therapy may deliver immediate surface smoothing while needling sustains deeper remodeling. Studies and reviews report:
- Smoother, tighter skin and reduced pores/irregularities within 2–3 months.
- Better acne-scar outcomes when erbium (or other fractional lasers) is layered with needling/PRP versus monotherapy.
- Comparable or faster texture restoration than single treatments, with manageable downtime when erbium is used fractionally/low-fluence.
- Evidence spans RCTs and meta-analyses of microneedling may + PRP for scars, fractional erbium combinations, and RF-microneedling literature showing broad safety across skin types.
Which Treatment Is Better for You?
Choosing the right approach, whether microneedling, erbium laser, or a combination, depends on your skin goals, downtime tolerance, and budget. Microneedling cost is lower and ideal when you’re focusing on improving texture or acne scarring that may need gradual repair.
If you want a deeper impact like reducing fine lines and wrinkles or major skin-surface changes, then laser therapy may be a stronger fit. Government and clinical guidance on laser resurfacing emphasises tailoring treatment based on skin type and condition.
Why Consultation with a Professional Matters Most
Choosing between microneedling or laser shouldn’t be done without professional input. Dermatologists assess not just your visible skin issues but the underlying structural concerns within the skin, including collagen density, pigmentation risk, and past treatment history.
According to research published by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (PubMed), expert evaluation ensures safer, more predictable results and helps avoid complications like post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), especially in patients with skin of color.
A professional will also determine the ideal course of treatment,for instance, multiple microneedling sessions for collagen induction versus one or two erbium laser sessions for resurfacing. They can explain how each option interacts with your unique biology, helping you choose the best approach for your skin health and long-term improvement.
Real-World Scenarios; When Each Treatment Works Best
- Microneedling is great for younger patients or those with mild acne scarring, textural irregularities, or early signs of ageing. It improves the appearance of scars and fine lines through controlled micro-injury that activates collagen synthesis over time.
- Erbium or fractional CO2 laser resurfacing is ideal for deeper atrophic scars, severe photodamage, and more advanced aging. Because the erbium laser’s light energy is absorbed by the skin’s water molecules, it removes damaged cells and triggers rapid new tissue formation.
- Combination treatments, starting with microneedling and following with fractional erbium, work best for patients wanting significant resurfacing while limiting downtime. This approach smooths scarring and skin texture, tightens pores, and refines pigmentation for balanced rejuvenation.
A 2020 clinical study published in Dermatologic Therapy found that combining microneedling with fractional laser resurfacing significantly enhanced collagen remodeling and produced stronger long-term skin-strengthening results compared to using either treatment alone.
Expert Recommendation from the Institute of Medical Physics
At the Institute of Medical Physics, founded by Dr. Emanuel Paleco, each treatment plan is customized to balance safety, effectiveness, and recovery. For patients focused on natural improvement with minimal interruption, microneedling often provides excellent results, especially when combined with PRP or a light non-ablative laser treatment.
For more advanced rejuvenation, fractional ablative erbium laser therapy is recommended, it removes surface irregularities, boosts elasticity, and enhances clarity for those seeking a single, transformative session. Patients with deep scars or long-term sun damage may benefit most from a course of treatment alternating both modalities.
Ultimately, the clinic’s guidance emphasizes that both options can be highly effective, microneedling for gradual, cost-efficient collagen renewal and erbium laser for faster, high-impact resurfacing. By consulting a qualified practitioner, patients ensure that their treatment safely targets issues deep within the skin while improving overall texture, tone, and radiance.
Before You Go…
Achieving lasting results from erbium laser resurfacing or microneedling goes beyond the procedure, it depends on how you prepare, heal, and care for your skin afterward. The best outcomes come from working with a qualified specialist, following a tailored skincare plan, and maintaining consistent post-care.
Every choice, from practitioner expertise to daily sun protection, affects how long your skin stays smooth, firm, and radiant. Proper hydration, SPF, and gentle skincare help preserve collagen renewal deep within the skin, extending your glow for months to come.
About the Institute of Medical Physics
Founded by Dr. Emanuel Paleco, the Institute of Medical Physics is a leading UK centre for Medical and Aesthetic Laser Science, with clinics in King’s Cross, North London, and Essex. The Institute specialises in erbium fractional laser resurfacing, microneedling with PRP, and other evidence-based skin regeneration therapies.
Dr. Paleco’s team combines medical precision with advanced technology to restore skin texture and tone safely and effectively.
Book your consultation to experience expert, science-led care designed to achieve natural, long-lasting skin rejuvenation.
FAQs
How does Erbium Laser compare to CO2 Laser Resurfacing?
Erbium laser heals faster and causes less heat damage, while CO2 laser resurfacing penetrates deeper for stronger resurfacing results but requires longer downtime.
Is Microneedling as effective as CO2 Laser for acne scars?
Microneedling offers gradual improvement for mild acne scarring, while fractional CO2 laser resurfacing delivers faster, more dramatic results for deeper scars.
Can I combine Microneedling and Fractional CO2 Laser for better results?
Yes. Combining microneedling and fractional CO2 targets multiple skin layers, needling boosts collagen within the skin, while laser energy refines the surface.
Which treatment improves overall skin tone and firmness best?
Fractional CO2 laser resurfacing tightens and brightens skin quickly, while microneedling and nonablative fractional lasers gradually enhance elasticity and tone.
How do I choose between CO2 Laser and Microneedling for my skin type?
For deeper resurfacing, CO2 laser works best; for sensitive or darker skin, microneedling offers safer rejuvenation with less risk and downtime.


By -
Dr. Emanuel Paleco, PhD
November 4, 2025





