Weâre excited to hear from you!
SCHEDULE A FREE CONSULTATION
GENERAL ENQUIRES
Call us
7 Days a Week
0208 135 6968
What's App
7 Days a Week
07818 383 033
Web-Chat
Available Now
Email
â12 hour Response
hello@medicalphysics.institute
Our Science is Different
Call - Text - Email
7days a Week
07541 425 257
hello@medicalphysics.institute
Book a Free Consult
Using our Online Booking Tool
Web-Chat
Available Now
Our Science is Different
Which Type of Laser Hair Removal Is Best: A Clinical Comparison
Laser hair removal is a non-invasive cosmetic procedure that uses focused light energy to target and damage hair follicles, reducing hair growth over time. While the outcome may appear simple, the technology behind laser hair removal is complex and highly variable.Â
A range of laser systems is available in clinical practice today. Choosing the best type of laser hair removal depends on several biological and technical factors, including skin tone, hair thickness, and follicle depth.
Key Takeaways
Laser hair removal therapy works on the principle of selective photothermolysis. This process involves directing light at a specific wavelength to target melanin, the pigment found in hair. When the melanin absorbs the laserâs energy, it converts it into heat. This heat travels down the shaft and into the follicle, damaging the root and slowing future growth.
The success of this technique depends on precise calibration. Lasers must produce the right wavelength, energy density, and pulse duration to target follicles without harming the surrounding skin.Â
For hair removal, devices typically operate in the 700 to 1064 nanometre range. Each wavelength penetrates the skin at a different depth and interacts with melanin in unique ways.
Hair grows in cycles. Only follicles in the active growth phase, known as anagen, respond effectively to laser treatment. As not all hairs are in the anagen phase at the same time, multiple sessions are required to achieve a long-term reduction.
Not all laser systems are built the same. Each device is engineered with a specific wavelength, pulse duration, and target depth in mind. These differences enable clinicians to tailor treatments to the patientâs skin tone, hair density, and follicle depth.Â
Hereâs a quick comparison between these devices:
Alexandriteâ
Diodeâ
Nd: YAGâ
IPL (Intense Pulsed Light)â
Electrocoagulationâ
The Alexandrite laser operates at a wavelength of 755 nanometres, placing it within the near-infrared spectrum. This specific wavelength is well absorbed by melanin, which makes it effective for targeting hair follicles in individuals with lighter skin tones. Its relatively shallow penetration depth is suited to treating hair located closer to the skin's surface.
This system is particularly effective on Fitzpatrick skin types I to III. In these phototypes, melanin concentration in the epidermis is lower, which reduces the risk of unwanted pigmentary changes.Â
Treatment sessions are typically faster with Alexandrite systems. Their large spot sizes and rapid repetition rates enable clinicians to cover wide areas, such as the legs or arms, in a shorter amount of time.Â
The Nd: YAG laser operates at a wavelength of 1064 nanometres. This longer wavelength penetrates deeper into the skin and is absorbed less by melanin. As a result, it is considered the safest option for Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI.
Lower melanin absorption reduces the risk of burns and pigmentary changes in darker skin. The laser's deeper reach also makes it suitable for targeting coarse hair in areas such as the bikini line or underarms. Treatment sessions are generally slower compared to other systems, but they offer reliable results when used with appropriate parameters.
The Diode laser typically operates within the 800 to 810 nanometre range. This wavelength provides a balance between melanin absorption and skin penetration, making it suitable for Fitzpatrick skin types I to V.
Its moderate depth allows the laser to target follicles effectively without excessive heating of the surrounding tissue. The Diode system performs well on coarse hair and is often used on large areas such as the back, chest, and legs. Treatment sessions are efficient, and most patients require six to eight sessions for optimal results.
Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and electrocoagulation are often used as alternatives to traditional laser systems. Although commonly grouped with lasers, IPL is not a true laser. It emits a broad spectrum of light, typically between 500 and 1200 nanometres, and requires filters to target melanin. This variation can result in less precise energy delivery compared to coherent laser beams.
IPL is most effective on Fitzpatrick skin types I to III with dark hair. This type of laser treatment works best on shallow follicles and is often used for treating facial areas. Results are less predictable, and most patients require eight to ten sessions for visible improvement. Due to its lower selectivity, there is a higher risk of pigmentation issues in darker skin types.
Electrocoagulation does not rely on light. Instead, it uses electrical current to directly damage the hair follicle. This method can be effective for light or fine hair that lacks melanin, including grey or blonde strands. It is often used on small areas such as the upper lip or chin. Results appear gradually over multiple treatments, typically requiring eight to twelve sessions.
Laser treatment outcomes vary based on how the device interacts with melanin, follicle depth, and the surrounding skin. Matching the right technology to the patientâs physiological characteristics improves both safety and efficacy.Â
The Fitzpatrick scale is widely used in dermatology to classify skin types based on melanin content and response to sun exposure. It ranges from Type I, representing very fair skin, to Type VI, representing very dark skin. Melanin concentration increases with each category, directly affecting laser absorption and treatment safety.
Lasers with higher melanin absorption, such as Alexandrite at 755 nanometres, are most effective on lighter skin types, specifically Fitzpatrick I to III. In these cases, the contrast between dark hair and light skin allows the laser to focus energy on the follicle with minimal risk to surrounding tissue.Â
For darker skin types, particularly those with IV to VI skin tones, longer wavelengths, such as the Nd: YAG at 1064 nanometers, are recommended. These penetrate deeper and are absorbed less by epidermal melanin, reducing the chance of burns or hyperpigmentation.
Diode lasers, typically operating at 800 to 810 nanometres, are versatile and suitable for a broader range of skin types. IPL devices and short-wavelength lasers may carry a higher risk for darker skin unless carefully filtered and calibrated.
Hair follicles are not uniform in depth. Facial and arm hair tends to sit closer to the skin surface, while areas such as the bikini line, legs, and back often have deeper follicles. Selecting a laser with the appropriate penetration depth is essential for accurate targeting.
Alexandrite lasers deliver energy at a moderate depth, making them suitable for treating mid-depth follicles commonly found in the face and limbs. Diode lasers reach deeper layers and are often used for denser or coarser hair on larger body areas.Â
The Nd: YAG laser provides the deepest penetration among hair removal systems. Its wavelength allows it to bypass surface melanin and reach follicles in thicker dermal tissue.
IPL systems, while adaptable, offer inconsistent depth due to their broad-spectrum output. This makes them less reliable for targeting deep follicles. Electrocoagulation, on the other hand, is effective for superficial hairs, particularly those with low melanin content.
Laser hair removal is widely regarded as safe. Most side effects are temporary and reflect a controlled response to follicular heat exposure. Common reactions include erythema, swelling, and tingling, usually subsiding within one to two days.
The likelihood of adverse effects increases in darker skin types due to higher melanin levels in the epidermis. To address this, systems such as the Nd: YAG laser are preferred, given their deeper penetration and lower surface absorption.Â
On the other hand, devices like Alexandrite and IPL, which target melanin more aggressively, carry a higher risk of epidermal damage in these patients.
Post-treatment care is crucial in enhancing comfort and minimizing inflammation. Cooling gels, barrier creams, or probiotic sprays are typically applied after the session. Patients with sensitive skin or those who have recently experienced sun exposure may benefit from extended recovery intervals between laser hair removal sessions.
Hereâs a quick comparison of the safety profiles across laser types:
1. Alexandriteâ
2. Diodeâ
3. Nd: YAGâ
4. IPL (Intense Pulsed Light)â
5. Electrocoagulationâ
With correct technique and personalised treatment planning, the risk of complications remains low. A clear understanding of skin type, hair biology, and laser physics allows clinicians to minimise side effects while delivering consistent and effective results.
Long-term results in laser hair removal depend on the deviceâs ability to deliver thermal energy to the follicle during the anagen phase of hair growth. This stage offers the highest concentration of melanin, allowing for effective absorption and follicular disruption. Because hair grows in cycles, multiple treatments are necessary to target all follicles during their active growth phase.
Alexandrite and Diode lasers are commonly used in patients with lighter skin tones and have shown strong efficacy in reducing hair growth over several months.Â
Nd: YAG lasers, with their deeper reach and lower melanin absorption, are preferred for darker skin types, offering reliable results with a lower risk of pigmentation issues.Â
IPL and electrocoagulation systems are used in specific cases, though results tend to vary based on hair type and operator experience.
The following factors play a key role in achieving lasting outcomes:
When these variables are managed well, laser hair removal can offer long-term hair reduction with minimal maintenance. Results often last for several months to years, with occasional touch-up sessions depending on individual physiology.
Laser hair removal continues to evolve through advances in technology, deeper biological understanding, and more precise treatment protocols. Choosing the most effective laser depends on a careful match between device characteristics and individual patient factors such as skin tone, hair type, and follicle depth.Â
This clinical comparison highlights how each system functions under different conditions and why no single approach works for every case. For those interested in learning more about treatment techniques, patient outcomes, or laser physics in aesthetic medicine, further reading can offer a deeper understanding of the science behind long-term results.
The Institute of Medical Physics, founded by Dr. Emanuel Paleco, is a premier medical laboratory specialising in Medical and Aesthetic Laser Science. With a flagship clinic in Kingâs Cross and additional locations in North London and Essex, the Institute is at the forefront of laser science innovation.Â
Experience advanced laser science and innovative medical treatments. Book a consultation with Dr. Emanuel Paleco and his expert team at the Institute of Medical Physics.
Laser treatment can reduce hormonally influenced hair growth, but results may vary. Conditions such as PCOS or thyroid disorders may require maintenance sessions due to ongoing follicular stimulation.
Laser hair removal is commonly used on delicate areas. The choice of device and settings is adjusted to reduce discomfort and avoid skin irritation.
Temporary reduction refers to a decrease in visible hair for several months, while permanent removal indicates long-term follicular damage with minimal regrowth. Most laser systems aim for sustained reduction rather than total removal.
Clinics often recommend avoiding sun exposure, waxing, and depilatory creams for at least 2 weeks while preparing for your laser hair removal treatment. Shaving is typically required to preserve follicle structure for effective targeting.
Tanned skin may increase the risk of pigment changes and reduce the accuracy of treatment. Most clinicians advise waiting until the tan fades before starting or continuing sessions.
Which Type of Laser Hair Removal Is Best: A Clinical Comparison
Laser hair removal is a non-invasive cosmetic procedure that uses focused light energy to target and damage hair follicles, reducing hair growth over time. While the outcome may appear simple, the technology behind laser hair removal is complex and highly variable.Â
A range of laser systems is available in clinical practice today. Choosing the best type of laser hair removal depends on several biological and technical factors, including skin tone, hair thickness, and follicle depth.
Key Takeaways
Laser hair removal therapy works on the principle of selective photothermolysis. This process involves directing light at a specific wavelength to target melanin, the pigment found in hair. When the melanin absorbs the laserâs energy, it converts it into heat. This heat travels down the shaft and into the follicle, damaging the root and slowing future growth.
The success of this technique depends on precise calibration. Lasers must produce the right wavelength, energy density, and pulse duration to target follicles without harming the surrounding skin.Â
For hair removal, devices typically operate in the 700 to 1064 nanometre range. Each wavelength penetrates the skin at a different depth and interacts with melanin in unique ways.
Hair grows in cycles. Only follicles in the active growth phase, known as anagen, respond effectively to laser treatment. As not all hairs are in the anagen phase at the same time, multiple sessions are required to achieve a long-term reduction.
Not all laser systems are built the same. Each device is engineered with a specific wavelength, pulse duration, and target depth in mind. These differences enable clinicians to tailor treatments to the patientâs skin tone, hair density, and follicle depth.Â
Hereâs a quick comparison between these devices:
Alexandriteâ
Diodeâ
Nd: YAGâ
IPL (Intense Pulsed Light)â
Electrocoagulationâ
The Alexandrite laser operates at a wavelength of 755 nanometres, placing it within the near-infrared spectrum. This specific wavelength is well absorbed by melanin, which makes it effective for targeting hair follicles in individuals with lighter skin tones. Its relatively shallow penetration depth is suited to treating hair located closer to the skin's surface.
This system is particularly effective on Fitzpatrick skin types I to III. In these phototypes, melanin concentration in the epidermis is lower, which reduces the risk of unwanted pigmentary changes.Â
Treatment sessions are typically faster with Alexandrite systems. Their large spot sizes and rapid repetition rates enable clinicians to cover wide areas, such as the legs or arms, in a shorter amount of time.Â
The Nd: YAG laser operates at a wavelength of 1064 nanometres. This longer wavelength penetrates deeper into the skin and is absorbed less by melanin. As a result, it is considered the safest option for Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI.
Lower melanin absorption reduces the risk of burns and pigmentary changes in darker skin. The laser's deeper reach also makes it suitable for targeting coarse hair in areas such as the bikini line or underarms. Treatment sessions are generally slower compared to other systems, but they offer reliable results when used with appropriate parameters.
The Diode laser typically operates within the 800 to 810 nanometre range. This wavelength provides a balance between melanin absorption and skin penetration, making it suitable for Fitzpatrick skin types I to V.
Its moderate depth allows the laser to target follicles effectively without excessive heating of the surrounding tissue. The Diode system performs well on coarse hair and is often used on large areas such as the back, chest, and legs. Treatment sessions are efficient, and most patients require six to eight sessions for optimal results.
Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) and electrocoagulation are often used as alternatives to traditional laser systems. Although commonly grouped with lasers, IPL is not a true laser. It emits a broad spectrum of light, typically between 500 and 1200 nanometres, and requires filters to target melanin. This variation can result in less precise energy delivery compared to coherent laser beams.
IPL is most effective on Fitzpatrick skin types I to III with dark hair. This type of laser treatment works best on shallow follicles and is often used for treating facial areas. Results are less predictable, and most patients require eight to ten sessions for visible improvement. Due to its lower selectivity, there is a higher risk of pigmentation issues in darker skin types.
Electrocoagulation does not rely on light. Instead, it uses electrical current to directly damage the hair follicle. This method can be effective for light or fine hair that lacks melanin, including grey or blonde strands. It is often used on small areas such as the upper lip or chin. Results appear gradually over multiple treatments, typically requiring eight to twelve sessions.
Laser treatment outcomes vary based on how the device interacts with melanin, follicle depth, and the surrounding skin. Matching the right technology to the patientâs physiological characteristics improves both safety and efficacy.Â
The Fitzpatrick scale is widely used in dermatology to classify skin types based on melanin content and response to sun exposure. It ranges from Type I, representing very fair skin, to Type VI, representing very dark skin. Melanin concentration increases with each category, directly affecting laser absorption and treatment safety.
Lasers with higher melanin absorption, such as Alexandrite at 755 nanometres, are most effective on lighter skin types, specifically Fitzpatrick I to III. In these cases, the contrast between dark hair and light skin allows the laser to focus energy on the follicle with minimal risk to surrounding tissue.Â
For darker skin types, particularly those with IV to VI skin tones, longer wavelengths, such as the Nd: YAG at 1064 nanometers, are recommended. These penetrate deeper and are absorbed less by epidermal melanin, reducing the chance of burns or hyperpigmentation.
Diode lasers, typically operating at 800 to 810 nanometres, are versatile and suitable for a broader range of skin types. IPL devices and short-wavelength lasers may carry a higher risk for darker skin unless carefully filtered and calibrated.
Hair follicles are not uniform in depth. Facial and arm hair tends to sit closer to the skin surface, while areas such as the bikini line, legs, and back often have deeper follicles. Selecting a laser with the appropriate penetration depth is essential for accurate targeting.
Alexandrite lasers deliver energy at a moderate depth, making them suitable for treating mid-depth follicles commonly found in the face and limbs. Diode lasers reach deeper layers and are often used for denser or coarser hair on larger body areas.Â
The Nd: YAG laser provides the deepest penetration among hair removal systems. Its wavelength allows it to bypass surface melanin and reach follicles in thicker dermal tissue.
IPL systems, while adaptable, offer inconsistent depth due to their broad-spectrum output. This makes them less reliable for targeting deep follicles. Electrocoagulation, on the other hand, is effective for superficial hairs, particularly those with low melanin content.
Laser hair removal is widely regarded as safe. Most side effects are temporary and reflect a controlled response to follicular heat exposure. Common reactions include erythema, swelling, and tingling, usually subsiding within one to two days.
The likelihood of adverse effects increases in darker skin types due to higher melanin levels in the epidermis. To address this, systems such as the Nd: YAG laser are preferred, given their deeper penetration and lower surface absorption.Â
On the other hand, devices like Alexandrite and IPL, which target melanin more aggressively, carry a higher risk of epidermal damage in these patients.
Post-treatment care is crucial in enhancing comfort and minimizing inflammation. Cooling gels, barrier creams, or probiotic sprays are typically applied after the session. Patients with sensitive skin or those who have recently experienced sun exposure may benefit from extended recovery intervals between laser hair removal sessions.
Hereâs a quick comparison of the safety profiles across laser types:
1. Alexandriteâ
2. Diodeâ
3. Nd: YAGâ
4. IPL (Intense Pulsed Light)â
5. Electrocoagulationâ
With correct technique and personalised treatment planning, the risk of complications remains low. A clear understanding of skin type, hair biology, and laser physics allows clinicians to minimise side effects while delivering consistent and effective results.
Long-term results in laser hair removal depend on the deviceâs ability to deliver thermal energy to the follicle during the anagen phase of hair growth. This stage offers the highest concentration of melanin, allowing for effective absorption and follicular disruption. Because hair grows in cycles, multiple treatments are necessary to target all follicles during their active growth phase.
Alexandrite and Diode lasers are commonly used in patients with lighter skin tones and have shown strong efficacy in reducing hair growth over several months.Â
Nd: YAG lasers, with their deeper reach and lower melanin absorption, are preferred for darker skin types, offering reliable results with a lower risk of pigmentation issues.Â
IPL and electrocoagulation systems are used in specific cases, though results tend to vary based on hair type and operator experience.
The following factors play a key role in achieving lasting outcomes:
When these variables are managed well, laser hair removal can offer long-term hair reduction with minimal maintenance. Results often last for several months to years, with occasional touch-up sessions depending on individual physiology.
Laser hair removal continues to evolve through advances in technology, deeper biological understanding, and more precise treatment protocols. Choosing the most effective laser depends on a careful match between device characteristics and individual patient factors such as skin tone, hair type, and follicle depth.Â
This clinical comparison highlights how each system functions under different conditions and why no single approach works for every case. For those interested in learning more about treatment techniques, patient outcomes, or laser physics in aesthetic medicine, further reading can offer a deeper understanding of the science behind long-term results.
The Institute of Medical Physics, founded by Dr. Emanuel Paleco, is a premier medical laboratory specialising in Medical and Aesthetic Laser Science. With a flagship clinic in Kingâs Cross and additional locations in North London and Essex, the Institute is at the forefront of laser science innovation.Â
Experience advanced laser science and innovative medical treatments. Book a consultation with Dr. Emanuel Paleco and his expert team at the Institute of Medical Physics.
Laser treatment can reduce hormonally influenced hair growth, but results may vary. Conditions such as PCOS or thyroid disorders may require maintenance sessions due to ongoing follicular stimulation.
Laser hair removal is commonly used on delicate areas. The choice of device and settings is adjusted to reduce discomfort and avoid skin irritation.
Temporary reduction refers to a decrease in visible hair for several months, while permanent removal indicates long-term follicular damage with minimal regrowth. Most laser systems aim for sustained reduction rather than total removal.
Clinics often recommend avoiding sun exposure, waxing, and depilatory creams for at least 2 weeks while preparing for your laser hair removal treatment. Shaving is typically required to preserve follicle structure for effective targeting.
Tanned skin may increase the risk of pigment changes and reduce the accuracy of treatment. Most clinicians advise waiting until the tan fades before starting or continuing sessions.
By -
Dr. Emanuel Paleco, PhD
July 18, 2025